Challenging the Chair


A London Market firm asked BP&E Global to undertake a Board Effectiveness Review. The purpose was part of their triennial cycle of good governance. They were also due a regulatory visit and knew the regulators had some concerns about the rigorousness of the Board.

The Board comprised:

  • 3 Non-Executive Directors, 2 who represented an overseas part-owner parent company and one of which was Chair and a major shareholder himself
  • 3 Independent Non-Executives
  • 5 Executive Directors including the CEO, FD, CRO, Head of Legal and CUO 


We proposed a four-stage review:

  • Stage 1: Desk based research to check the governance structure in place, the reality of what was happening and how this was recorded
  • Stage 2: A questionnaire to highlight any areas of concern and open-up thinking in preparation for interviews
  • Stage 3: Individual interviews to explore any concerns and dive deeper into questionnaire responses
  • Stage 4: Board and Committees’ Observation to see the Board and Committees in action. The desk based research showed that the chair was very involved.

The agenda was very high level and there were always many ‘tabled’ items, or AOB discussions instigated by the Chair. The minutes conveyed a very high level of input from the Chair. The questionnaire showed that there was satisfaction with how collegiate the Board was, but conversely frustration at the leadership by the Chair.

In the interviews with the Board, members expressed their frustration at the lack of challenge and seriousness, with much being discussed ‘on a whim’. Papers were always late and of poor quality. They also felt that the lines separating governance and oversight/delegation were often overstepped, especially by the Chair and the CEO was therefore disempowered. These points were borne out by the Board and committee observations.

The Chair was enjoying his retirement and coming to see his firm and friends, without consideration for regulatory requirements or what the company needed to grow and be sustainable, with a fully functioning Board.

BP&E Global recommended that the agenda be reviewed with an annual cycle of agenda items, both strategic, risk, regulatory and operational, and deep dives on a cycle. We also recommended that there were strict guidelines on Board papers in terms of content, layout and timeliness to reduce the number of tabled items. We recommended that the INEDs were rotated off the Board as two had served over 9 years and one was a personal friend of the Chair.

From a Board composition perspective, we questioned whether they were still the right fit for what the Board needed going forward. We also spoke privately to the Chair about empowering the CEO and entrusting him with the business allowing him to run the company.


The Board agreed to our recommendations and we worked with the firm to design an appropriate Board paper in house style for them, with a rolling agenda. We worked with the firm to identify the best Board composition for them and the INEDs were gradually changed and the new INEDs carefully chosen to fit culture and what the business needed going forward. The Chair also saw how he was not helping his own firm and had not considered the impact of his over-involvement.

Since our work with the organisation, the Board has timely papers, which are well structured set within a robust agenda that is followed appropriately. The Chair has instigated more pre-Board and post-Board dinners and lunches so that he still gets the social interaction and the feeling of a level of involvement he enjoys, but has fully empowered the CEO who has really grown in the role.

Click here to read our other case studies.

You can also email or  call us on +44 (0) 20 7764 0721 to discuss how our insight could make your Board more effective.  

BP&E Global – Board performance matters 

Download our brochure


Keep Up To Date

Subscribe to our newsletter,

Board Matters